![]() |
A study by Satizabal et al published
in the NEJM found that dementia rates
fell steadily over the past three decades, likely due to declining rates of
heart disease.
The study analyzed data
collected since 1975 from the Framingham Heart Study
and included 5205 persons 60 years of age or older. The authors compared interactions
between epoch and age, sex, apolipoprotein E ε4 status, educational level, as
well as the effects of vascular risk factors such as cardiovascular disease on the
prevalence of dementia.
The 5-year age-and sex-adjusted
cumulative hazard rates for dementia were 3.6 per 100 persons during the first
epoch (late 1970s and early 1980s), 2.8 per 100 persons during the second epoch
(late 1980s and early 1990s), 2.2 per 100 persons during the third epoch (late
1990s and early 2000s), and 2.0 per 100 persons during the fourth epoch (late
2000s and early 2010s). Relative to the incidence during the first epoch, the
incidence declined by 22%, 38%, and 44% during the second, third, and fourth
epochs, respectively. This risk reduction was observed only among persons who
had at least a high school diploma. The prevalence of most vascular risk
factors (except obesity and diabetes) and the risk of dementia associated with
stroke, atrial fibrillation, or heart failure have decreased over time, but
none of these trends completely explain the decrease in the incidence of the
disease.
The authors concluded that the
incidence of dementia has declined over the course of three decades.
N Engl J Med 2016; 374:523-532
|
Showing posts with label New England Journal of Medicine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New England Journal of Medicine. Show all posts
Friday, April 1, 2016
Decades long decline in Dementia
Tuesday, December 1, 2015
SPRINT trial redefines blood pressure targets
More than 70 million people in the United States suffer from hypertension – which presently is defined by a systolic blood pressure of higher than 140 mm Hg and a diastolic of higher than 90 mm Hg. A landmark study called SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) challenges the accepted guidelines of optimum level for systolic blood pressure and provided information about benefits and shortcomings of intensive pharmacotherapy. The study was published in NEJM was interrupted nearly two years early, when it became apparent that lower blood pressure for most people over 50 prevented heart problems and deaths.
In the SPRINT trial, 14,692 patients
were assessed for eligibility, and 9361 individuals with a systolic blood
pressure of 130 mm Hg or higher and an increased cardiovascular risk, but
without diabetes, were randomly assigned in two groups; a systolic
blood-pressure target group of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) or a
target group of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment).
The primary outcomes were myocardial
infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death
from cardiovascular causes.
At 1 year, the mean systolic blood
pressure was 121.4 mm Hg in the intensive-treatment group and 136.2 mm Hg in
the standard-treatment group. The mean number of blood-pressure medications was
2.8 in the intensive-treatment group and 1.8 in the standard-treatment group. The intervention was stopped early after a
median follow-up of 3.26 years owing to a significantly lower rate of the
primary composite outcome in the intensive-treatment group than in the
standard-treatment group (1.65% per year vs. 2.19% per year; hazard ratio with
intensive treatment, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.89;
P<0.001). All-cause mortality was also significantly lower in the
intensive-treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.90; P=0.003).
Investigators found that there were 27% fewer
deaths (155 compared with 210) and 38% fewer cases of heart failure (62
compared with 100) among patients who achieved the
systolic pressure target of 120 mm Hg than among those who achieved the current
140 mm Hg target.
The lower
relative risk of major cardiovascular events observed across subgroups defined
according to age, sex, race, medical history, and baseline blood pressure among
patients who achieved the systolic pressure target of 120 mm Hg in comparison
to those who achieved the currently recommended level of 140 mm Hg.
Rates of serious adverse events of
hypotension, syncope were 67% and 33% higher in the intensive therapy
group. Electrolyte abnormalities, and
acute kidney failure were noted but injuries due to falls surprisingly were not
more common, as had been feared among the elderly in the intensive-treatment
group.
The research indicated that among
patients over 50 at high risk for cardiovascular events who are not diabetics,
targeting a systolic blood pressure below the current guidelines of 140 or 150
mm Hg to less than 120 mm Hg, prevented heart disease and strokes and thus save
lives.
DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)