More than 70 million people in the United States suffer from hypertension – which presently is defined by a systolic blood pressure of higher than 140 mm Hg and a diastolic of higher than 90 mm Hg. A landmark study called SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) challenges the accepted guidelines of optimum level for systolic blood pressure and provided information about benefits and shortcomings of intensive pharmacotherapy. The study was published in NEJM was interrupted nearly two years early, when it became apparent that lower blood pressure for most people over 50 prevented heart problems and deaths.
In the SPRINT trial, 14,692 patients
were assessed for eligibility, and 9361 individuals with a systolic blood
pressure of 130 mm Hg or higher and an increased cardiovascular risk, but
without diabetes, were randomly assigned in two groups; a systolic
blood-pressure target group of less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) or a
target group of less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment).
The primary outcomes were myocardial
infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death
from cardiovascular causes.
At 1 year, the mean systolic blood
pressure was 121.4 mm Hg in the intensive-treatment group and 136.2 mm Hg in
the standard-treatment group. The mean number of blood-pressure medications was
2.8 in the intensive-treatment group and 1.8 in the standard-treatment group. The intervention was stopped early after a
median follow-up of 3.26 years owing to a significantly lower rate of the
primary composite outcome in the intensive-treatment group than in the
standard-treatment group (1.65% per year vs. 2.19% per year; hazard ratio with
intensive treatment, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.89;
P<0.001). All-cause mortality was also significantly lower in the
intensive-treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.90; P=0.003).
Investigators found that there were 27% fewer
deaths (155 compared with 210) and 38% fewer cases of heart failure (62
compared with 100) among patients who achieved the
systolic pressure target of 120 mm Hg than among those who achieved the current
140 mm Hg target.
The lower
relative risk of major cardiovascular events observed across subgroups defined
according to age, sex, race, medical history, and baseline blood pressure among
patients who achieved the systolic pressure target of 120 mm Hg in comparison
to those who achieved the currently recommended level of 140 mm Hg.
Rates of serious adverse events of
hypotension, syncope were 67% and 33% higher in the intensive therapy
group. Electrolyte abnormalities, and
acute kidney failure were noted but injuries due to falls surprisingly were not
more common, as had been feared among the elderly in the intensive-treatment
group.
The research indicated that among
patients over 50 at high risk for cardiovascular events who are not diabetics,
targeting a systolic blood pressure below the current guidelines of 140 or 150
mm Hg to less than 120 mm Hg, prevented heart disease and strokes and thus save
lives.
DOI:
10.1056/NEJMoa1511939
No comments:
Post a Comment